Causal Determinism

Philosophy Mini Paper 1 causative determinism claims that our past, initial conditions are deterministicly conditioned by native laws. Causal determinism deals with conditional predictability, which says that if I know all of my past/present material conditions and natural laws, then I end know my future causal elbow room. Since we always base our choices on our highest desire, we can easily predict what choices one is going to make. It seems real plausible for casual determinism to be true. With causal determinism on one end of the spectrum, and existentialism on the opposite end, we have two conflicting philosophies of romance vs logic.It seems nevertheless logical for us to assume that indeed, we base our decisions based upon what we deeply, truly desire the most. The notion that we lack the contentedness of free will, though, is daunting. To gestate that we have no control over our lives is really rather terrifying, so it becomes very apparent why someone would want to r eject these theories. Causal determinism hasnt necessarily affected my views of life dramatically, that it helps keep everything into a conscious perspective. To live a meaningful life its important to live consciously, that is to say, to function the hypnotizing effects of living life monotonously.I believe that in order to accomplish a pellucid life, its important to retain existentialist aspects in daily life. To live life on a path without the sense of freedom seems like it would be similar to those nightmares we have in which we know the horrors that are more or less to happen, but can do nothing to prevent it. To live a robotic life is as well easy. To impel everything into the wind and say that we have no control over our lives is too easy. To say mercifulity has an unfitness to control itself is far too pessimistic and a twisted way to live ones life.Its empowering to believe in ones ability to make something of their life, to truly live life spiritually. I dont feel t hat causal determinism should impacts ones views on lesson responsibility drastically. To think that whatever is going to happen will happen anyway, and to avoid morality, is definitely a flawed way of thinking. Because of our desire to live in a morally praiseworthy fashion, we may permit moral values influence the decisions we make. We should not simply disregard everything happening in our surroundings because we think we have no control.As far as friendship goes, yes, we typically befriend those that are like-minded in some regard or another. This isnt a new or unusual concept, this notion is widely known. There are countless psychological factors that are at work with the ongoing process of friend-making. Causal determinism doesnt change what is already known about making friends. Love is one of the most confusing of human emotions. To say that there is a soul mate for each person would be agreeing with causal determinism. It seems, in an odd sense, too romantic for the theo ry, but theyre one in the same regardless.Some believe in soul mates, that there is one person each is destined to belong with. It would make sense for a causal determinist to believe in the idea of a soul mate. Causal determinism feels far too depressing to follow religiously in a day-to-day lifestyle. While the theory may be a logically correct way to look at life, it seems to strongly strip away what it factor to live as a conscious human. Sure its important to keep a balance of logic and romance in the way one lives their life, but it seems like following causal determinism may be tipping this scale too far to one side.