Leadership In Context And The Saf Leadership Doctrine Management Essay

leading In Context And The Saf leading Doctrine Management EssayLeadership have been exposit as the process of influence others, perhaps true to say that leading have become feature of any culture throughout history. It has certainly been an essential quality in all cultures that have survived and flourished. The objective of this consequence is to explain the understanding of lead in the linguistic context of SAF, the SAF leading aptitude model and Framework deportment / Competency / Skill approaches. It will then answered on the ideas or issues to which there ar two things to be examined over the concept or theory and fall outed by the reflection from lesson 1 to 5.What Is LeadershipWhat leadership instrument to me and why it matters in Royal Brunei Armed Forces (RBAF)? Leadership is a responsibility to lead a group or organisation in order to carry out the mission or complete the labor effectively. As an officer in the armed forces, I must(prenominal) be able to inspire the quite a little by showing my character, values of existing fields and possess ingenuous communication. This ability has been cultivated since the arising when I joined the organisation.In Royal Brunei Armed Forces (RBAF), the context is referred to leader and manager. The two approaches argon different, where a leader can be described as a somebody who shows the way, urges and goals, and manager is a person who oversees, supervises, strings and administers2. Therefore to be effective in what we do we must have both skills. As a leader must have vision, being able to communicate that vision and convince our people to follow and to sequester willingly. In addition to that, the core values explain how we as a leaders and managers must act as a use models for our subordinates to follow. It describes how we must behave in order to motivate and guide those for whom we are responsible in RBAF.The SAF Leadership Doctrine (Framework Competency Model)What is remarkable in the SAF Leadership good example is the order of two main forms, namely in the form of triangle and readiness. SAF has developed extensive and purport towards the direction of the third Generation SAF. In the second form of the framework explains the pattern of leadership for the sought after direction. The uniqueness of this framework shake offs pictorial understanding the meaning and thought leadership in the two forms of order. individual(a)ly form has a framework as a distinctive feature descriptions are summarized as followsIn a circle each leader must emphasize affect people with a good understanding of the mission and objectives, operating environment and the want results. Triangle provides a framework to determine the involve for leaders to effective leadership in the SAF. Benefits of this framework create awareness in performing their duties and responsibilities and sleep together where the weaknesses that needs to be improved. For understanding the context of lead ership, the triangle shape consists of four domains which are values, competencies, styles and self. The form of the circle can identify the contextual through three domains, namely the mission and objectives, operating environment and desired outcomes3.This framework is not only expanding the list of ingredients for effective leadership, but also emphasized the unique importance. This context called the SAF Leadership 24-7 as shown in render 14. Every building blocks affect a leader and moving journey through the contacts contained in a circle. Form of this framework can be employ to service Tri and also to the inferior and middle managers. Contextual insight 3 domains have affinity with formula of leadership in the SAF. If either wholeness of the domain is failed, then overall will be unsuccessful.Figure 1. SAF Leadership Framework 24-7Behavioural / Competency / Skill Approaches to LeadershipThe SAF Leadership Competency Model consists of louvre competency domains and 14 ski lls are common to the SAF5. In the skill domains are divided into 3 levels of leadership of different Behaviours Direct, Organizational and strategic. The style approach emphasises the behaviour of the leaders. Style approach is different from trait and skills approaches because it focuses on what leaders do rather than are. There are two primary behaviours which are task behaviours and similarityship behaviours. The task behaviours facilitate goal accomplishment or reach the objectives. Relationship behaviours help subordinates feel well-heeled with themselves, with each other and the situation. The central focus is how leaders combined these two behaviours. Blake Mouton developed a model that described leadership behaviours on a managerial or leadership grid. The basic article of belief is that based on concern for production and concern for people, the leadership style will fall into angiotensin converting enzyme of the 4 quadrants6.By understanding the behaviour that lead s tyle can be seen how you play the role as a leader. The main focus is what leaders do and how they act. As shown in Figure 2, the managerial behaviour is the preferred style reach to operate which is both concern for people and results, and it also weigh the area of environment you operate. However, this style is soft, but production will run smoothly. The behaviour approach requisite a great depth of understanding to study linkage to leadership.Figure 2. The Leadership Grid7What are the going concepts between leadership and management?The terms leadership and management are see otherwise by various people. The biggest difference between managers and leaders is the way they inspire the people who work or follow them. Back to the definition, leadership is a process whereby an individual influences a group of individuals to achieve a common goal, whereas management is to exercise managerial, administrative and supervisory direction of a group or administration8. Leadership and management share many similarities. Both leadership and management involve influence, running(a) with people, and working with effective goal management. However, the fields of leadership and management can also be considered very different.To distinguish between leadership and management, a comparison between leadership and management activities is shown in Figure 3. An individual can be a great leader, a great manager, or both, but each area requires the mastery of slightly different skills and competencies.LEADERSHIPMANAGEMENTKEY THEORISTS seek order and stabilitySeeking adaptive and constructive changeKotter (1990)Do the right thingsDo things rightBennis Nanus (1985)Multidirectional relationship rise up mutual purposeUnidirectional relationshipCoordinating activitiesRost (1991)Source Northouse, 2007, p. 9-10Figure 3. Comparison Function of Leadership and ManagementAlthough there is a clear distinction between management and leadership, two roles are overlapping. draw back for example, Ship CO lead the command of the ship for patrol with his crews. When CO takes charge on preparation and controlling, he is come to in management. When CO became manager in influencing the ships crew to achieve their task, he is involved in leadership. Both processes affect the ships crew to achieve the task. Overall, this is depends on the tasking implementn where the CO can take more leadership and less management or vice-versa.Do I want more leadership/management oriented responsibilities?Again taking an example as Ship CO where his leadership whitethorn vary depending on his task and works with his crew. His management function will demand more as to direct after the men including the ship so ship organisation will run efficiently. As shown in Figure 3 above, management is rough seeking order and stability leadership is about seeking adaptive and constructive9. When there is more leadership responsibilities, it required time and concentration of reason for Ship CO that will affect changes on his crew.My specialisation and weaknessBy understanding the leadership in context, more in-depth thought to show that there are weaknesses in my area of leadership. In lesson 1 to 5, can be make a distinction whether my leadership style and leadership effectiveness for this has been achieved or need to be developed. As shown in the diagram on Figure 1 above, the leadership competency framework model, generally through this form of triangle and circle guidance can establish from one of 4 building blocks. The understanding of military leadership and the difference between management, leadership and command give an overview and their relationship to my reflection. During this course, the main focus is to look and think into my Personal Mastery and Self. On top of that, the 5 competency domains and 14 skill domains can be taken as education knowledge.The MBTI tool is described about the preferences to distinguish my type of personality whether the function of judging (thinking and feeling) and perceiving functions (sensing Intuition). My profile obtained was based on ENTJ (Direct Decide), strength of character that helped me through character Extraversion and Thinking. However, to assist on my weakness parts, I need to look into Introversion which several of this type should appreciate deep thinking methodology and understanding the logic.Meanwhile, IDAP methods provide weighty feedback to guide me towards achieving the desired direction. From short to long term goal that measure my success. Strength and weakness of the evidence provided will develop and improve my weakness area with the help of coaching method. Interviews were conducted with the Directing Staff to label my IDAP. To achieve my goal is to do a reflection on my strength and weakness and taking the feedback positively. shoemakers lastThe essay has explained on my understanding on leadership in context and the important of it in relation to RBAF. The SAF Leadership Fr amework competency which has a unique to SAF and the Behavioural / Competency / Skill approaches to leadership give more thought on style approach and competency domain which is common to SAF. To elaborate further, it discussed the difference between leadership and management and their responsibilities. As a manager and a leader both roles are significant by having their style approach towards the task. Overall my reflection on the lesson 1 5, has significantly circularise my awareness especially the tools (MBTI and IDAP) which will further improve my leadership knowledge during this course.